Skillwick

A system worth
questioning.

Give a real question a place to unfold.
From the role brief to a supported finding.

Enter the workbench ↓
01 / Role brief

Trace the fee.

Meridian · Banking assistant

A realistic system, with something worth checking.

Tool responseget_fee

€14.50

get_fee({"name":"replacement_card_eur"})

The wrong amount is already in the tool response.

The brief becomes the work.

Explore Meridian: a synthetic bank, a conversational assistant and inspectable tool data. Bring the source into the comparison bay and follow the discrepancy.

Tool responseget_fee

€14.50

get_fee({"name":"replacement_card_eur"})

The wrong amount is already in the tool response.

Current catalogue

€9.00

catalogue.fees.replacement_card_eur

Compare the same fee, currency and product. Control the variables before drawing a conclusion.

Supported finding

The error is already upstream.

Replacement card · 2 source records

The €5.50 difference begins in the tool data. Test its cause, scope and impact.

2 source records attached ↗

Drag the catalogue toward the dock, or use the button.

Same product. Same currency. Two different amounts.

Read the original records and a matching control

Dispatcher response

get_fee({"name":"replacement_card_eur"})
{
  "ok": true,
  "name": "replacement_card_eur",
  "value": 14.5,
  "display": "€14.50",
  "message": "The replacement card fee is €14.50."
}

Current catalogue

catalogue.fees.replacement_card_eur
{
  "name": "replacement_card_eur",
  "value": 9,
  "currency": "EUR"
}

The tool returns €14.50, while the current catalogue lists €9.00. The €5.50 discrepancy is already present in the tool data.

Matching control

The tool and current catalogue both show €2.50. This entry is a matching control; it does not show a fee discrepancy.

get_fee({"name":"atm_withdrawal_eur"}) catalogue.fees.atm_withdrawal_eur

Repeat the call, vary the fee and compare the result. A matching control helps isolate the discrepancy.

Illustrative evidence · Synthetic banking data · Human review

  1. 01 / BriefSet a useful question.

    Agree the role, the context and practical constraints.

  2. 02 / ScenarioEnter a realistic system.

    Explore Meridian through the banking app, assistant and APIs.

  3. 03 / EvidenceTest your explanation.

    Change a variable, add a control and keep the source records.

  4. 04 / FindingMake a supported claim.

    Explain the observation, its impact and what remains uncertain.

  5. 05 / ConversationAsk what comes next.

    Discuss the evidence and the experiment that would change your mind.

A connected team workspace for invitations, submissions and shared review is part of the planned platform.

A brief with consequences.

Choose an example role. See its brief, candidate encounter and review focus take shape.

Financial support · Tool reliability

01 / Brief

Trace the fee.

Investigate a banking assistant. Build a test that separates an answer error from bad tool data.

02 / Candidate encounter

€14.50 meets €9.00.

A replacement-card tool response disagrees with the authoritative fee catalogue.

03 / Reviewer focus

Locate the failure.

Look for controlled comparisons, source references and a clear account of what remains uncertain.

Illustrative preview of planned profiles. No assessment is configured.

Test the reasoning. Keep the decision human.

Give candidates work worth exploring, and your team evidence worth discussing.

Open Skillwick